Sunday, June 18, 2017

We Believe in Fathers

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, eyeglassesSo today I got to speak in church with my brother, which was fun.  Most people don't think speaking in church is fun, but we are both weird that way.  It's Fathers Day so we'll blame Dad. He likes speaking, too.

Stan was actually the visiting speaker from the High Council and traditionally they bring a recently returned missionary with them as a companion speaker.  When he said he was speaking in our ward, I volunteered myself.  Two years returned may not be recent if you are 20 but, two years is nothing when you're 48.

The topic from the Bishop was the youth lesson topic for June, which is priesthood and priesthood keys.  Since it is also Fathers Day, I wanted to say something about that, because fathers are awesome.

So here it is.  It's my speaking draft, not a polished article so the quote sources aren't footnoted or hyperlinked, but you can go to www.lds.org and toss the quotes in the search bar if you are curious.

We Believe in Fathers

[Apostle] Elder D. Todd Christofferson made an interesting statement in last year’s April conference.  He said, “As a Church, we believe in fathers.”   I am intrigued by this.  If “as a Church” we believe something then have I taken the time and effort to personally receive a witness that I personally believe in fathers?   Let’s break it down a bit.
1.  We believe in fathers.  Because my first go to on anything is snark, if you asked , “do you believe in fathers?”  you may get the answer “yes, I believe that fathers exist.”  And fathers do exist.  Unfortunately, in today’s world there is a vast range of what we as society refer to as fathers.  From a brief biological encounter all the way to being “a good dad.”  So fathers exist, not new news to anyone but I thought we should get that out of the way.  In fact, the Lord declared that His work and glory was “to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life” of His children.  To me there seems to be an earthly parallel.  To bring to pass the mortality and life of children.  The partnership between mother and father brings mortality and brings life.  Together they are responsible for this vital step in the plan of salvation.  Without fatherhood (and motherhood) the whole plan of salvation stops. But it doesn’t stop.  Because of fathers.  We believe in fathers.
2.  We believe in fathers.  It isn’t unusual at a sporting event, or before some other performance for the phrase “ I believe in you” to be used as encouragement or confidence that the person is up to the challenge of what lies ahead.  So, when we believe in fathers we are encouraging and confident that Dad is up to the challenge of fatherhood.  Dads, we trust that your love will be there 24/7.  We are grateful for hard work at home and at work.  Especially at work.  As I frequently remind my children “if work were fun it would be called fun, not work.”  While there is satisfaction and enjoyment to be found on the job, for the most part it’s plain old work.  Thank you, fathers, for getting up at o’dark thirty to provide your families with food and shelter. 
In the words of President Linda Burton, “Today I wish to honor husbands, fathers, brothers, sons, and uncles who know who they are and who are doing their best to fulfill their God-given roles as described in the family proclamation, including righteously presiding and providing for and protecting their families.”   Unfortunately, such honor and respect is becoming increasing uncommon in the culture.  When not being shown as a bumbling idiot or creepy philanderer on the screen,  society routinely debates whether fathers are even needed beyond conception. On lds.org,  Chad Phares writes, “I’m not the dad you see on TV.
You know the one I’m talking about—the one who is more concerned about remote controls than report cards. The guy who spends more time bowling with his buddies than brushing his daughter’s hair. The dad who can name each of his football team’s top draft picks but can’t remember his kids’ birthdays.
Yeah, that dad.
Well, I’m not him—and neither are most of us. Sure, we’ve got our quirks, but the majority of dads are infinitely more nuanced than the two-dimensional cardboard cutouts we are depicted to be.”  The truth about dads, is that they are amazing.  They worry, the work, they agonize, they encourage, they teach, they are exhausted!  And they don’t quit.  To quote Elder Christofferson, “We believe that far from being superfluous, fathers are unique and irreplaceable.” Thank you, fathers.  We believe in fathers.
3. We believe in fathers.  Fatherhood has a spiritual component, or in other words, an eternal component to it.  We believe, i.e. have received personal revelation or a testimony of fathers.  Our understanding of fatherhood is more than just a helpful social construct that increases the odds that small humans will be provided for and protected long enough to grow into adult humans.  We believe that fatherhood is “divinely designed” by God for the salvation of his children.  We believe that the family is the basic unit not only of society, but of eternity.  As fathers strive to provide the earthly necessities of life, to provide shelter  and protection from the storms and dangers, they also are tasked with providing the spiritual necessities of life.  Of providing spiritual shelter and protection from the storms and dangers to their children’s spiritual lives.  In past times, life was more of a nasty, brutish and short proposition.  Starvation, attack, storms and untreatable medical problems consumed family life.  Not so much today here in Hidden Valley.  While working to provide is still very stressful, the brutish physical aspects of life are not as looming.  What is looming is the starvation of our spirits.  The attacks and storms of the adversary are not slowing down, they are increasing.  I doubt any of you fathers have sent your children off to school here and hoped and prayed that Johnny and Janey won’t get eaten by a bear on the way to the bus stop.  But I know you have hoped and prayed  that they will not get devoured spiritually by pornography, immorality, drugs, or even idleness.  The dangers are different in 2017 than 1017 but the damage has longer repercussions.  Because we believe that what we do and what we covenant affects us spiritually and eternally, God has given us fathers to “protect and provide” for the spiritual necessities of life. 
I love these words of Elder Christofferson, “ For men, fatherhood exposes us to our own weaknesses and our need to improve. Fatherhood requires sacrifice, but it is a source of incomparable satisfaction, even joy. Again, the ultimate model is our Heavenly Father, who so loved us, His spirit children, that He gave us His Only Begotten Son for our salvation and exaltation. Jesus said, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” Fathers manifest that love as they lay down their lives day by day, laboring in the service and support of their families.
Perhaps the most essential of a father’s work is to turn the hearts of his children to their Heavenly Father. If by his example as well as his words a father can demonstrate what fidelity to God looks like in day-to-day living, that father will have given his children the key to peace in this life and eternal life in the world to come.  A father who reads scripture to and with his children acquaints them with the voice of the Lord. OR to put it in scripture,  “And they shall also teach their children to pray, and to walk uprightly before the Lord.”
This is why we believe in fathers.
We started with the proposition that “as a Church we believe in fathers.”  We’ve gone over a few of the ways we believe in fathers, but the original thought says that we do so “as a Church.”  Why? Why “as a Church” do we believe in fathers? Simply put, it is because “the family is ordained of God. It is the most important unit in time and in eternity. Even before we were born on the earth, we were part of a family. Each of us “is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents” with “a divine nature and destiny” (“The Family: A Proclamation to the World,” Ensign, Nov. 1995, 102). God is our Heavenly Father, and we lived in His presence as part of His family in the premortal life. There we learned our first lessons and were prepared for mortality (see D&C 138:56).” 
            In fact, let’s just go full on Handbook summary:       
“Because of God’s love for us, He prepared a plan that included our coming to the earth, where we would receive bodies and be tested so that we could progress and become more like Him. This plan is called “the plan of salvation” (Alma 24:14), “the great plan of happiness” (Alma 42:8), and “the plan of redemption” (Alma 12:25; see also verses 26–33).
The purpose of God’s plan is to lead us to eternal life. God declared, “This is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 1:39). Eternal life is God’s greatest gift to His children (see D&C 14:7). It is exaltation in the highest degree of the celestial kingdom. Through the plan of salvation, we can receive this blessing of returning to God’s presence and receiving a fulness of joy.
In order to gain exaltation in the kingdom of God, we must overcome two obstacles of mortality: death and sin. Because we cannot overcome either obstacle by ourselves, Heavenly Father sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to be our Savior and Redeemer. The Savior’s atoning sacrifice made it possible for all of God’s children to overcome physical death, be resurrected, and gain immortality. The Atonement also made it possible for those who repent and follow Him to overcome spiritual death, return to God’s presence to dwell with Him, and obtain eternal life (see D&C 45:3–5).
As part of our Heavenly Father’s plan, we were born into families. He established families to bring us happiness, to help us learn correct principles in a loving atmosphere, and to prepare us for eternal life.
Parents have the vital responsibility to help their children prepare to return to Heavenly Father. Parents fulfill this responsibility by teaching their children to follow Jesus Christ and live His gospel.
The Church provides the organization and means for teaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to all of God’s children. It provides the priesthood authority to administer the ordinances of salvation and exaltation to all who are worthy and willing to accept them.”
To recap, we lived as a family before coming to earth, we live as families here in mortality, and because of the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ we can live as families for eternity by the power and keys of priesthood ordinances.
So “as a Church” we believe in fathers because families are the hope and substance of eternity. 
I have a confession to make.  My talk today is not supposed to be on fathers.  It’s on priesthood and priesthood keys.  Because “the rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven,” and heaven’s foremost concern is for our returning as families.  To do so requires the power and authority of God, (that is priesthood) and those ordained to act in his stead to administer the ordinances and officiate in covenantal ceremonies (priesthood keys). 
I have read/heard/recited the “the family is ordained of God” more times than I can count.  I’ve given talks, taught lessons, pinned cute memes to pinterest on it, but it has always been just an obvious truth to me.  An important truth, but certainly not startling revelatory or anything.  And yet, after merging the concept of families, in this case specifically fathers, with the purpose of priesthood and priesthood keys, the word that jumped out to me was not family, it was ordained.  The family is ordained of God. 
In writing the Family Proclamation the word the apostles used was ordained.  Not organized, not created by, but ordained.  To ordain is to set in order according to the law.  To ordain in a church setting, it is to set in order according to the law of God.  When you are  ordained to the priesthood you are authorized within that office to do the duties of that office.  Not just that you are able to fulfill those duties but that you are obligated to do so.  In effect you are being legally set apart to act in an official capacity as God would act if he were physically present.  No wonder priesthood holders start as deacons with very limited assignments! 
As the bishop of our ward, Bishop Johnson has the keys, which means the rights and the obligations to direct the work of salvation for the Hidden Valley Ward.  One of his duties is to prepare the young and not so young men for ordination to priesthood offices.  Those twelve and thirteen year old young men who weekly pass the sacrament are acting in their official priesthood capacity.  Passing trays of bread and water may seem pretty mundane, but there is more to it than that.  As ordained deacons they are learning that priesthood service is just that: service.  They are offering the sacrament to us, literally bring the symbols of the atonement to within our very reach.  It is an offering from the Savior, delivered by the deacons. 
At fourteen a young man may be ordained to be a teacher, and indeed he begins to train as a teacher with his home teaching companion.  Every month, this ordained teacher has the opportunity to pray for his home teaching families, to prepare a gospel message for them, and then to sit there nervously on the couch wishing his senior companion would stop with the small talk so he can give his lesson before he dies of anxiety.  Instead of bringing the sacrament to you in church, he is bringing the gospel to you in your very home.
At sixteen he may be ordained to be a priest.  Every week the priests sit at the sacrament table.  While we sing, they work to make the final preparations for the ordinance of the sacrament.  Then the priest will kneel and plead to heaven on our behalf.  “ Oh God, the eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify.” Etc.  The sacrament is vital to our commitment and repentance.  To our sanctification.  To our salvation.  And these priesthood holders petition on our behalf.  As priests of the order of Aaron, they are also authorized, under the keys of the bishop, to baptize.  Many of you have had the privilege of watching a 16 year old son, nephew or grandson raise his arm  to the square and with authority from God, boldly (and it is a very bold statement to make) “Having been commissioned of Jesus Christ, I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” 
Around 18/19 there is the opportunity to prepare and then be ordained to the office of Elder in the Melchizedek priesthood.  We could spend all day on this, but let’s summarize it by saying, Elders preach the gospel.  They go and preach to every kindred, tongue and people.  They may be as anxious as that 14 year old home teacher but they go.  They bring the message and ordinances of salvation to the world.  They act as representatives of Jesus Christ.  They do this regardless of whether they are a full-time missionary or not.  The call to preach of an Elder is not contingent on a black name tag. 
Elders also have the privilege of attending the temple.  There they receive the ordinances and blessings of the temple which are ultimately crowned with the sealing of husband to wife for time and all eternity. 
And there it is.  That’s the point.  That’s the point of priesthood, of priesthood keys.  To enter into an eternal covenant as husband and wife, to bring children into this covenant by birth and instruction.  That is the point.  Priesthood service, starting at 12 and continuing through eternity is to prepare young and not so young men for the privileges and obligations of being a family forever.  For being a husband and, as I may have mentioned, to be a father.  As a Church, and individually, we believe in fathers.  Because we have a Heavenly Father who loves us beyond our comprehension, he has blessed us with the opportunity to have, or maybe even be fathers.
           

 



Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Harry Logic

Fifteen years ago (Yikes!) When my children were draining my brain cells at an alarming rate, I would work logic puzzles to counteract Barney and The Teletubbies.  At some point, I decided to write one (or five), and since we were in the midst of Harry Potter, I roped J. K. Rowling's characters into service, and Stephanie Black into writing the story.  I'm not sure other people write logic puzzles as fan fiction, but why not?

Snack Attack is elementary school level.  The others are not.  I have this vague memory that April Fools may require felix felicis. So in order of difficulty (I think) it is Snack Attack, Owl Mail, Gilderoy's Valentines, Leapin' Leprechauns, and April Fools.

In the words of Hermione, "This isn't magic--it's logic puzzle. A lot of the greatest wizards haven't got an ounce of logic, they'd be stuck in here forever." (Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, JK Rowling, pg 207)

 If you are unfamiliar with this type of puzzle, here is a most excellent resource. Logic Puzzle Resource

If you are unfamiliar with Harry Potter, then get with the program and get to the bookstore.

Logic Puzzle April Fool's Day

based on the books by the awesome J. K. Rowling
April Fool's Day
Harry looked up from his steak and kidney pie as Fred and George approached the Gryffindor table. Both of them were walking as though picking their way through Professor Lupin’s dark creatures obstacle course.
"Hi," said Hermione, her mouth twitching.
Fred and George didn’t reply. They were too busy shaking their chairs, running their hands up and down the chair legs and examining the undersides of the seats.
Ron sniggered. "What’s the matter? Afraid someone hexed your chairs?"
Harry tried to keep a straight face, but when he saw Professor McGonagall shoot a severe look at the twins and lean over to whisper something to Dumbledore, he lost control. He burst into laughter and had to clamp his napkin over his mouth to keep from spraying the table with bits of meat.
"Weasley’s Wizard Wheezes will have their revenge," said Fred, sitting down and gingerly prodding the dish of potatoes as though he expected it to explode.
Lee Jordan erupted in mirth so loud that everyone in the Great Hall turned to look at him. "Who are you going to get revenge on? You don’t even know who’s guilty."
"We’ll figure it out," said George grimly. "And woe betide the fools. . ."
Unbeknownst to Fred and George, the Weasley family, (Ginny, Ron, Percy, Bill, Arthur, and Charlie) got together with Madame Hooch, Professor Dumbledore, Professor Sinistra, Filch, Madame Pomfrey and Hagrid to turn the tables on Fred and George.
Fred got tricked twice, as did George, and twice Fred and George were caught together.
Fred and George (either individually or together in no particular order) were surprised to find homework disappearing from the desk, turning into a canary, a "Hex Me" sign stuck on the back of his/their robes, forgetting his/their own name (am I Fred? Or am I George?), and one team fixed it up so that instead of speaking, every word came out as an Opera aria. Professor McGonagall was not amused when a powerful love potion was used and she was the object of desire! Unfortunately for the Twins, all of these took place in rather public places (common room, breakfast, charms class, transfiguration, lunch and a school assembly in that order).
Help Fred and George find their tormentors with the following clues.

  1. Dumbledore was not in cahoots with Bill. Sinistra did not help Charlie.
  2. The homework trick and the canary trick caught the same person (or people).
  3. Fred was spared singing any opera at all.
  4. The six tricks were the one played by Hagrid, Percy, Bill, Madame Hooch, the one at breakfast, and the opera singing.
  5. The love potion involved only one female (besides Professor McGonagall, of course)—but not Madame Pomfrey. (FYI Professor Sinistra is female)
  6. The only Weasley Filch was willing to work with was Percy and their trick went down before Dumbledore’s.
  7. The following tricks happened in this order: Homework disappeared, Name(s) forgotten, Arthur Weasley got revenge and the love potion inspired poems, flowers and candy.
  8. Ginny’s trick was immediately before the canary trick and Filch’s was immediately after the canary transfiguration.
  9. Bill and Charlie managed to get both of their brothers. And Bill got them during transfiguration class
  10. Hagrid finally got George (only) back after years of fantasizing about it.
  11. Madame Pomfrey finished her trick before Professor Sinistra finished hers.
  12. The "Hex Me" and the Canary were played on different individuals.

Logic Puzzle Leapin' Leprechauns

based on the books by the awesome J. K. Rowling
Leapin' Leprechauns

A swarm of green wooshed past Harry, Ron and Hermione as the entered Hogwart's Castle after Care of Magical Creatures.
"Leprechauns!" gasped Harry. "What are they doing here?"
"Probably scattering disappearing gold around. . .stupid little green gits," muttered Ron, clearly still smarting under the memory of the leprechaun gold that had tricked him into thinking he had repaid Harry for the omnioculars at the Quidditch World Cup.
"The gold they leave doesn't always disappear," said Hermione. "Sometimes they leave real gold, or even chocolate gold coins. They usually give chocolate coins to children, I think, but you never know with leprechauns."
"Chocolate gold?" said Ron with a blank look. "Little hard to spend, isn't it?"
"You don't spend it. You eat it. Then sometimes they leave other metal coins painted to look like gold--to fool Muggles, you know. In the "Lives of British Muggles" I read--"
"Here comes Snape!" interrupted Harry. They watched as Snape swooped down the stairs, an unusually cheerful look on his ugly, sallow face. In his hands he clutched a small green pot.
"Full of leprechaun gold!" whispered Hermione and she, Ron and Harry turned toward the Great Hall.
"I hope he got the disappearing gold," said Ron. "What else did the leprechauns leave, I wonder?"
The Leprechauns have left five pots of gold at Hogwarts. Though only one pot contains real gold the rest look as though they do(there are chocolate gold coins, Invisible coins, Leprechaun gold and Painted metal coins). The pots were found by Professors Dumbledore, Flitwick, McGonagall, Snape and Sprout. They found them in the Classroom, Common room Entrance Hall, Great Hall and the Staffroom. The "amounts" were 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 galleons. (None of these are necessarily respective).

  1. The amount the chocolate coins were "worth" was equal to that of the invisible coins together with the coins that were found in the classroom (which weren't painted). (3 separate amounts)
  2. Snape was delighted that his coins were "worth" more than either McGonagall's or Dumbledore's.
  3. The coins found in the Entrance Hall were "worth" 20 galleons more than the ones in the Great Hall.
  4. The Leprechaun Gold was "worth" more than Professor McGonagall's and hers was "worth" more than the gold found in the staffroom.
  5. The real gold amounted to exactly half of Professor Flitwick's find.
  6. The five pots left by the Leprechauns were the pot in the Great Hall, the painted coins, the 10-galleon pot, the pot found by Professor Sprout and the real pot of gold.


Logic Puzzle Gilderoy's Valentines

based on the books by the awesome J. K. Rowling

Gilderoy Lockhart's Many Valentines


"Now, now, Minerva, don't go stealing my valentines." Gilderoy Lockhart wagged a finger at Professor McGonagall as she plucked a pink-wrapped package out of the treacle. "Now, if you let me teach you the secrets of my charm, you'll be pelted with owls throughout the month of February just like me."
"Being pelted with gifts from twittering children is not something I aspire to, Gilderoy," said McGonagall coldly as she handed Lockhart his sticky package.
Down at the Gryffindor table, Ron and Harry exchanged grins.
"Wonder who's twittery enough to send Lockhart a valentine?" muttered Seamus. "That brainless lump has been getting gifts all week."
"Dunno." Ron poured milk into his glass as half the females at the Gryffindor table blushed bright red. "No one with any taste, anyway."
"Oh, really?" said Hermione, recovering some dignity though her cheeks were still scarlet. "Errol was here just the other day, wasn't he, Ron? And he wasn't delivering a valentine for Ginny."
Now Ron was the one who blushed. Harry bit his lip to keep from laughing. What gift had Mrs. Weasley sent to the winner of Witch's Weekly's Most Charming Smile Award?

Gilderoy received one Valentine per day (Monday-Friday) from five swooning females (Ginny, Hermione, Lavender, Molly, Parvati) each sent him different type of Valentine (candy, card, flowers, a poem, a song). Each admired him because of a different attribute (his forget-me-not blue eyes, his curly hair, his stylish robes, his award-winning smile, and his enchanting voice). Of course each of these swooning females were mocked and teased by one of the non-impressed male population (Fred, George, Harry, Neville, Ron). As Gilderoy's memory is not what it used to be, help him sort out his admirers and their gifts (so he can send them autographed pictures--or perhaps some hair care potions) and find his detractors so he can adjust their grades accordingly.


  1. Fred was teasing someone the day before the hair admirer's token was given--but he wasn't teasing Lavender.
  2. George didn't tease the flower sender and surprised himself by having enough sense not to tease his mother (Molly).
  3. Monday's Valentine was inspired by Gilderoy Lockhart's enchanting voice.
  4. The song was given in the form of singing sheet music (but not from Hermione) the day after whoever liked Gilderoy's robes which was the day after Harry laughed himself sick mocking a lovestruck student.
  5. Molly and Ginny Weasley were the first and last people to deliver their Valentine's--but not necessarily respectively.
  6. The five who sent Valentines were Hermione, the one who admired Lockhart's hair, the person teased by Ron, Lavender and the one who sent flowers (in some order).
  7. Molly Weasley was embarrassed when she was teased by one of her own children about sending something to Gilderoy Lockhart for Valentine's Day.
  8. Parvati gave Professor Lockhart her Valentine the day before he got the poem, which was the day before Fred started teasing someone
  9. Ron and Neville teased the ones who sent the card and who liked Lockhart's eyes (in some order) but neither of them bothered the one who sent the candy. 

Logic Puzzle Owl Mail

based on the books by the awesome J. K. Rowling

This one didn't have a story,  Steph is such a slacker, spending all her time on her actual novels.


There are five owls (Errol, Hedwig, Hermes, Pig, School Owl) Five people who sent something (George, Harry, Hermione, Mrs. Weasley, Ron) Five people who received things (Charlie Weasley, Fred Weasley, Hagrid, Neville, Percy Weasley) and Five items that were delivered (invitation, howler, letter, package, R.S.V.P.)

Owl Mail

  1. Neither Mrs Weasley nor Hagrid sent or received anything with the services of Pig .
  2. Harry sent the package and Ron sent his item to a family member.
  3. The five owls involved were the School Owl, Errol, the one Mrs. Weasley used, the one to Percy and the one to Charlie.
  4. Whoever sent the invitation (it wasn't Hermione) didn't send it to Hagrid and didn't borrow the school owl.
  5. The two items taken by Hermes and Hedwig were the item from Hermione and the howler (but not necessarily respectively).
  6. Neville was grateful that George sent the R.S.V.P. to him and that the howler went to someone else.
  7. Fred was not surprised to receive the howler after his latest practical joke had gone awry.
  8. Hermione did not send anything to Percy.
  9. Hagrid didn't use the school owl.
  10. Charlie received his item by a Weasley family owl (Pig, Hermes or Errol).


Logic Puzzle : Snack Attack


Snack Attack (Elementary level, story by Steph) 

based on the books by the awesome J. K. Rowling

With end of year exams only a week away, the Gryffindor common room was unusually empty and unusually quiet, unless you counted the hiss of the sulphurous green smoke flooding out of Hermione's ears.  Harry smothered a chuckle--Hermione was embarrassed enough already.  He kept his eyes focused on the book in front of him and munched a handful of sweets, silently renewing his vow to never so much as lick any foodstuff offered to him by Fred or George and thinking that at least Hermione's smoking ears had served the purpose of clearing people from the room, thus making studying easier.  Ron was trying valiantly not to laugh, but Harry had seen the mischievous glint in his eye and knew he was plotting to enrich the coffers of Weasley's Wizard Wheezes by purchasing some smoking smarties and delivering them via anonymous owl to Draco Malfoy. 

"Here," Ron dropped his quill on the table and pushed a bowl of snacks toward Hermione.  "Maybe this will help. ..er. . .clear your head."

"No, thank you," said Hermione composedly, not looking up from the thick textbook she was studying.  "I'm all set."  She patted the open package of snacks next to her, a package she had purchased herself at Honeydukes.  Having spent the last half an hour engulfed in the odor of rotten eggs, Hermione wasn't taking any more chances. 

Ron slunk across the room and pushed open a window, bringing a flower-scented breeze wafting into the room.  He picked up his quill, groaned, and got back to studying, pausing occasionally to snack from his own stash of sweets (purchased by himself and kept on his person thereafter.  Following an unfortunate Nose Hair Caramel incident, Ron too had learned to be wary of unattended food). 

Can you tell from the following clues who (Harry, Ron, Hermione) was studying what subject (transfiguration, potions, charms) and which snack they were eating (Pumpkin pasties, chocolate frogs and Bertie Bott's Every Flavor Beans)?

1. The student who ate the chocolate frogs had already finished transfiguration (and so was working on something else).
2. The three students were Harry, the one who ate pumpkin pasties and the one studying transfiguration.
3.  Ron was not doing his charms homework but Harry was struggling with his Potions assignment.